Making Compromises in the Society

Table of Contents Introduction The Underlying Social Problem Research Questions Answers to the Research Question Literature Review Conclusion Works Cited Introduction People have different behaviors depending on their culture, age, sex, race and academic backgrounds. However, modernization has forced them to live with one another despite the presence of these differences.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Making Compromises in the Society specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More It is necessary to explain that even though people come from different backgrounds they have managed to live together without serious conflicts among them (Massey 76). This paper covers various aspects that an individual compromises to be accepted in his new society. The Underlying Social Problem This case explores the challenges an individual faces before he is allowed in a new society. The introduction part of this essay has pointed at t he issues that make people different from one another. However, these differences have not stopped people from visiting members of other societies and becoming part of them (Bales 56). It is necessary to explain that human beings are social animals and even though they have social, political and economic differences they can interact with one another and establish healthy relationships. The social issue being discussed here involves the compromises people make to fit into their new societies. This means they must strike a balance between their cultural values and decide to drop or add beliefs or practices that are not familiar to them. This problem is approached through assessing various aspects of deviance that make people to be accepted in a society. It is necessary to explain that the theory of Social Conflict is also an effective approach to this problem. This theory explains that the society has conflicts among different people with different interests. These differences make t he society to function properly; therefore, it plays significant roles in promoting unity among people. A conflict exists when people have different perspectives regarding an issue. This can also be explained by the principle of deviance that states that people who behave differently from a common way of life are deviant.Advertising Looking for assessment on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Therefore, an individual must compromise some aspects of his culture to fit in a new society. I am personally interested in this problem because the world is becoming a small village with many interactions among human beings. Therefore, it is prudent to know how to live with other people despite the differences in our backgrounds. Research Questions If this paper was a research work the research question would be, ‘Is compromise mandatory in the process of fitting in a new society?’ This paper would try to answe r this question by exploring various theories of socialization and identifying relevant concepts that are involved in this process. This question is appropriate since it seeks to establish the truth regarding compromise as a way of fitting in a new society. This question will try to find answers for the existence of different cultures and how they can be integrated to enable people to live in harmony. Occasionally, people experience conflicts due to the differences in their cultures and this creates misunderstanding among them. However, some people have managed to settle in new communities that have different cultures. Therefore, this question will examine issues that were affected before these people were free to live with strangers (Lewis 81). Even though, the world is becoming a small town and people from different races, cultures and tribes are interacting daily they still manage to maintain their cultures. This is another approach this question will take to unravel what people do before they are allowed into other communities and if the reverse is possible. Answers to the Research Question People have lived together despite the differences among them in terms of social, economic and political perspectives. This means that it is possible to coexist with one another despite the diversities among people. However, there must be issues that enable people to understand and transact various businesses with members of other communities. The most important issue to note here is that individuals must compromise some issues before they accommodate their differences and decide to live like members of the same community (Ferris 44). Secondly, there must be respect for the cultures of other communities.Advertising We will write a custom assessment sample on Making Compromises in the Society specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Studies have revealed that all cultures are equal since they have similar values and advance t he interests of their members. Therefore, an individual must respect the culture of the host community since this is the fastest way of establishing rapport with strangers. Thirdly, people must avoid a lot of resistance regarding other cultures even if they seem to go against the beliefs and practices of the other person. This will form the first step towards understanding and developing trust among people. This will help to reduce the assumption and stereotypes that the cultures of other communities are inferior and that an individual can exist in a strange community without compromising his cultural beliefs (Thomas 32). The assumption that cultures are in the mind and not actions is proved wrong when an individual discovers that he will be forced to drop some beliefs and pick others from the host community. However, this belief is wrong and does not play any role in explaining the possibilities of healthy interactions among members from different cultures. People must learn to res ist endogamy that restricts their activities to their practices. Literature Review Robert Bales in his work titled, Socialization and Interaction Process, explains that the family is the most important agent of socialization at the local level while peers and work mates are more influential when an individual matures. He claims that people learn a lot of things from those that are closer to them and thus when a child is growing up it is very close to its mother and other family members (Bales 22). However, as it continues to mature the gap between it and the family continues to widen as the ties among them weakens. When an individual moves to a new community he will start to learn new cultural practices from people that are close to him. Therefore, this will force the individual to compromise his original cultural practices and adopt new ones. Kelly Ferris identifies the society as the real world and compares it with a battle field where individuals do what is convenient to them and not what is right. He explores various factors that promote healthy relations among people and those that hinder the society from achieving harmony (Ferris 54).Advertising Looking for assessment on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More He explains that the theory of Symbolic Interaction is an effective way of viewing the society as a conglomerate of individuals that use symbols to communicate. Differences in cultural and traditional practices are overcome by communication using symbols that are known by members of different communities. David Lewis uses pragmatism to explain how human relationships work. He claims that despite the cultural differences among human beings they are able to use common sense to develop healthy relationships that are helpful in developing their societies (Lewis 19). He views cultural differences as personal differences that exist even within members that share similar beliefs. Therefore, cultural differences are in the mind and can be used positively if people become pragmatic when associating with others. He concludes that people can coexist peacefully despite their ancestral origins since these are mental pictures that do not have significant impacts in defining them. Garth Massey exp lains how the society functions and uses the Structural Functionalism Theory to explain that people are different but this helps them to perform various roles that enable the society to be alive. He claims that all societies have structures that perform different roles to enable people to live fulfilling lives (Massey 32). These structures include the family, church, school and friends among others. Therefore, an individual can live happily in any community provided he identifies the roles of these structures and follows their regulations. This will enable strangers to blend with the local population and live without fears of discrimination. Sophia Thomas explores the theories of socialization including the Conflict, Symbolic Interaction, Deviance and Social Behaviorism theories to explain how human relations work. She was very vocal in proposing that all these theories advanced by different scholars play significant roles in promoting learning among people from different background s (Thomas 77). She explained that the human mind can adjust and fit in any environment and this is evident when people move to new environment and are able to cope with the conditions in their new homes. Conclusion The research findings will show that people are not always expected to compromise their values to fit in other communities. There are many factors that determine whether an individual will be accepted in another community or not. My paper will show that the human mind plays significant roles in enabling strangers to be accepted in other communities. Works Cited Bales, Robert. Family: Socialization and Interaction Process. International Library of  Sociology. London: Routledge, 2010. Print. Ferris, Kelly. The Real World: An Introduction to Sociology. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2009. Print. Lewis, David. American Sociology and Pragmatism: Mead, Chicago Sociology, and  Symbolic Interaction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009. Print. Massey, Garth. Readin gs for Sociology. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 2008. Print. Thomas, Sophia. Socialization: Theories, Processes and Impact. Social Issues, Justice  and Status. New York: Nova Science, 2012. Print. This assessment on Making Compromises in the Society was written and submitted by user Bennett Cabrera to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Sample Personal Goal Essay for Colleges

Sample Personal Goal Essay for CollegesA sample personal goal essay for colleges is a great way to prepare for the interview process, because they are typically specific in what you're applying for. When you are writing for colleges, you're usually asking for admission to a specific college or school. So, while the essay may not be as involved as something more traditional, it is important to make sure you prepare for the interview as well. Writing a personal goal essay can sometimes be a little intimidating, but there are ways to make it easier and more enjoyable for you.First, before you begin writing your essay, you should take the time to do some research on the college you are applying to. Most of these schools require you to complete a variety of paperwork, so it is important to find out as much information as possible. You should try to find out if the school has any bad or good grades by doing online research.Now that you know which schools you want to apply to, you need to c ome up with a goal essay. This may be the most difficult part, because you need to come up with something you will actually use. However, once you have a goal, it will be much easier to write about the specific experience you want to share. You should also consider what types of activities you want to highlight when you write about your goal.Some people may find that writing this type of essay is very hard, especially if they have never written a personal goal essay before. However, if you don't mind being creative, then you should be fine. If you are one of those people who like to do research, then you might be able to come up with an entire essay in just a few minutes. Just keep in mind that you should not just write something that sounds good, but that you would really like to do.Finally, after you have created your personal goal essay, it is time to submit it. This may sound simple, but many students get too excited when they first start writing their essay. They might write th e essay first, and then fill in all the blanks later. Try to avoid this. The idea is to write the essay, then fill in the blanks after you've finished.There are some tips that you can follow to make this process a lot easier for you. If you're applying to colleges, the easiest way to do this is to focus on the benefits that you will receive if you get accepted to the college you want to go to. By creating a written description of all the benefits that you will receive if you apply to a particular college, you can make sure that your essay is strong enough to be accepted. Make sure that you do not repeat information or provide any inconsistencies in the essay.Although the personal goal essay can be easy for students to write, it still is a good idea to prepare. The reason is because there are some points that you will need to think about, and it is important to focus on the details you need to include in your essay. Taking some time and doing some research on the college you are appl ying to will allow you to become comfortable in doing so. Therefore, the process will be a lot easier, which makes it even more exciting to write your personal goal essay.

Liability of Frank for criminal damage pursuant Essay Example

Liability of Frank for criminal damage pursuant Essay Example Liability of Frank for criminal damage pursuant Essay Liability of Frank for criminal damage pursuant Essay Liability of Frank for condemnable harm and aggravated condemnable harm ( a ) The s1 ( 1 ) and s1 ( 3 ) offenses: To be guilty of simple condemnable harm under s1 ( 1 ) Criminal Damage Act 1971 ( CDA 1971 ) it must be established beyond sensible uncertainty that Frank: Intentionally or recklessly (work forces rea) †¦ destroyed or damaged belongings belonging to another without lawful alibi (actus reus) . The extra demand under s1 ( 3 ) of the Act is that the devastation / harm of the belongings in inquiry must hold been caused by fire ( i.e. simple incendiarism ) . Theactus reusandwork forces reamust be considered in bend. Actus Reus Destroy / harm belongings belonging to another without lawful alibi: In order for belongings to fall under the definition of destroyed’ or damaged’ for the intents of CDA 1971 some physical injury or impairment must happen, even if nil is really broken or deformed. In this scenario it is clear that the fire destroyed the notes belonging to Frank’s coach. The books on the tutor’s desk besides caught fire and were damaged / destroyed. It is clear that theactus reusdemands have been met. However, in order for Frank to be guilty of the s1 ( 1 ) and 1 ( 3 ) offenseswork forces reawould besides necessitate to be established. Work forces Rea Purpose or foolhardiness as to the belongings harm: Frank clearly intended to destruct the notes belonging to his coach since he intentionally pulled out a coffin nail igniter and put them alight. Therefore it can be concluded that Frank will be guilty of both the s1 ( 1 ) offense of simple condemnable harm and the s1 ( 3 ) offense of simple incendiarism unless he can set up a defense mechanism. ( I )Poisoning Given that Frank had taken a smattering of Valium prior to the meeting with his coach, can he trust on poisoning to contradict hiswork forces rea? To reply this inquiry it is necessary to find whether Frank’s poisoning was voluntary’ or involuntary.’ Given the fact that Frank took a handful of Valium, as opposed to the prescribed dosage, it is likely that his poisoning will be deemed voluntary. If this is the instance Frank can non claim that poisoning negated hiswork forces reasince poisoning can non be relied upon in this manner for offenses of non-specifcwork forces rea( which includes condemnable harm ) [ 1 ] . Frank’s poisoning may be treated as nonvoluntary if his pickings of the Valium, a usually non-dangerous drug, caused him to hallucinate, provided he was non foolhardy in taking the Valium. [ 2 ] Therefore Frank might reason that his depression caused him to take the extra Valium without gaining that his behavior may go unpredictable or unsafe. If he succeeds in this statement his pickings of the Valium will non be deemed foolhardy and he will be able to claim successfully that anywork forces reawas negated. If, on the other manus, his pickings of extra Valium is deemed foolhardy so Frank can non claim his poisoning was nonvoluntary. ( two )Lawful Excuse( s5 CDA 1971 ) Lawful alibi is merely available as a possible defense mechanism to simple condemnable harm and simple incendiarism, i.e. non the corresponding aggravated offenses. A suspect can trust on the s5 ( a ) defense mechanism if he believed at the clip of the offense that the individual to whom the damaged belongings belonged had consented to the harm or would hold consented to the harm had he known of the fortunes. Any such belief must hold been candidly held even if the belief was non a sensible 1. In the instance of an drunk suspect such as Frank the suspect can trust on the lawful alibi defense mechanism where, as a consequence of being intoxicated, he erroneously believed that the proprietor had ( or would hold ) consented to the harm. [ 3 ] If Frank raises the defense mechanism of lawful alibi it is up to the prosecution to turn out beyond sensible uncertainty the absence of lawful alibi. At the clip the harm was done Frank was in a secure environment and was holding a one-to-one meeting with his coach. There is nil to propose that the fortunes would hold led Frank to believe that his coach was accepting to the harm. Consequently, it is likely that the prosecution would be able to dispatch the load rather easy. Frank could potentially reason the s5 ( 2 ) ( B ) lawful alibi defense mechanism every bit good. Under s5 ( 2 ) a suspect is non guilty of condemnable harm he destroyed/damaged belongings in the honest ( non needfully sensible ) belief that it was in immediate demand of protection. Again, given the environment Frank was in at the clip it is likely that the prosecution could dispatch this load rather easy. Based on the analysis, it appears that Frank is guilty of simple condemnable harm and simple incendiarism capable to successfully set uping the defense mechanism of poisoning. ( B )The s1 ( 2 ) and s ( 3 ) offenses: To be guilty of aggravated condemnable harm under CDA 1971 it must be established beyond sensible uncertainty that Frank: Intentionally or recklessly (work forces rea) †¦ destroyed or damaged belongings belonging to another without lawful alibi (actus reus) and†¦ deliberately or recklessly endangered life by the harm (work forces rea) The extra demand under s1 ( 3 ) of the Act is that the devastation / harm of the belongings in inquiry must hold been caused by fire and that life must hold been endangered by the belongings harm that was caused by fire ( i.e. aggravated incendiarism ) . Again, theactus reusandwork forces reamust be considered in bend. Actus Reus Theactus reusof aggravated condemnable harm / aggravated incendiarism is the same as that of simple condemnable harm / simple incendiarism, as discussed above. It has already been established that Frank’s actions constituted theactus reusof simple incendiarism. Therefore, his actions besides constitute theactus reusof aggravated incendiarism. Work forces Rea Unlike simple condemnable harm / simple incendiarism, thework forces reaof the aggravated offenses is made up of two separate elements. In order for Frank to be found guilty of aggravated condemnable harm the prosecution must turn out that he: deliberately or recklessly damaged his tutor’s notes ; and intended to or was foolhardy as to life being endangered by the belongings harm. As with simple condemnable harm, the first component of thework forces reaseems to be satisfied. After all, Frank pulled out a coffin nail igniter and put fire to his tutor’s notes. As for the 2nd component of thework forces reait is deserving indicating out that at that place does non necessitate to be an existent hazard to life. It is sufficient that an ordinary, prudent bystander believes that life is endangered by the belongings harm. [ 4 ] Besides, any alleged danger to life must come from the devastation or damage itself, instead than from the method used to do the devastation or harm. [ 5 ] So, in the instance of aggravated condemnable harm there was evidently no danger to life caused by the harm to the tutor’s notes. In other words, the lone manner Frank could be guilty of aggravated condemnable harm was if he intended to jeopardize life by destructing his tutor’s notes. Therefore, Frank is non guilty of aggravated condemnable harm. Is Frank guilty of aggravated incendiarism? It might be possible to reason that Frank is guilty of aggravated incendiarism by claiming that the harm to his tutor’s notes caused harm to the books and other stuffs on the tutor’s desk ( since if the notes were non damaged by the initial fire so the books and any other belongings would non hold been damaged either ) through a concatenation reaction. This concatenation reaction of harm endangered life by doing the fire to distribute. Although Frank may non hold intended to jeopardize life the fact that he chose to put fire to the notes, and the fact that fires can distribute easy in paper-clad offices, may intend that he is deemed foolhardy as to life being endangered. In instance it can be established that Frank’s behaviour met the demands of aggravated incendiarism, it is once more necessary to see any possible defense mechanisms. Defense mechanisms ( I )Poisoning Frank may utilize the same statement outlined above to claim that his poisoning was nonvoluntary and it negated anywork forces reafor aggravated incendiarism. ( two )Lawful alibi The lawful alibi defense mechanism is merely available for simple condemnable harm and simple incendiarism, non for the aggravated offenses. Decision On the whole, it appears that Frank is guilty of simple condemnable harm and simple incendiarism. He is non guilty of aggravated condemnable harm and his liability for aggravated incendiarism is arguable. Bibliography Criminal Damage Act 1971 Majewski[ 1976 ] 2 All ER 142 Hardie[ 1985 ] 1 WLR 64 Jaggard V Dickinson[ 1980 ] 3 All ER 716 Sangha[ 1988 ] 2 All ER 385 Tip[ 1987 ] 2 All ER 833 Allen, M.J. –Textbook on Criminal Law( 6ThursdayEdition ) , Oxford University Press ( 2001 ) , pp.489-503 1

Friend Game Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Friend Game - Essay Example The article explains the different roles of each individual in the death of the girl, by sending malicious messages to her which frustrates the girl leading to her sudden death. Despite Tina’s endless trials to find justice for her lovely daughter, she does not get justice, and in return she turns to make the life of Lori Drew miserable. The Drew’s are aware that their daughter is responsible for the death of Megan, but they deny that fact blaming her that she actually took her life. Justice is denied to the Meier’s despite the endless efforts of the reporters who do the investigation to reveal the reality. Meier is a teenager who needs to be protected from malicious actions, and she is protected by the enforced privacy laws and laws governing the use of social media. In my view, she was denied justice is justified by the reasons discussed in the main body of the essay. Statement of the problem Abuse of the social media has been a problem for a long time which ha s become a global disaster to manage. The abuse is done through the internet harassment which is often done by sending of hostile messages to individuals over the social media. In the ‘Friend’s Game,’ article by Collins, we identify how a young girl of thirteen years is harassed by receiving hostile messages from friends, through her MySpace account. There are various people involved in the death of the thirteen year old girl involving even older people than her. The research tries to determine whether or not the woman did the cyber-bullying should be prosecuted or imprisoned. This is a problem that needs to be stopped with effective policies and laws governing social privacy. The laws should be enforced and enforced to be used in a court of law to determine cases of the same caliber. Objectives; Main objective - to determine whether or not the woman who did cyber-bullying should be prosecuted Other objectives; To identify reasons as to why the principal offender s should be prosecuted and imprisoned for their ‘crimes’ To indentify the influence of the offenders on the girl’s death To identify the laws and policies available and responsible for regulating use of internet and social media, governing the users’ privacy. Analysis and discussion In the analysis of the events and circumstances surrounding death of Meier Megan, a thirteen year old girl who commits suicide at her home. The girl is a victim of internet harassment. The aim of the study is to determine whether or not the woman who did cyber-bullying should be prosecuted. Objective to be discussed aims at obtaining reasons for prosecution or imprisonment; to determine the impact of the offenders on the death of the girl and to identify the laws and policies reasonable for enforcing internet privacy. Megan as an individual lead a natural lifestyle despite the challenges she faced due to her illness, but her parents were in hand to help her cope with the situat ion. Lori Drew and Megan lived in the same neighborhood, and they were long time friends who played together during their child hood. She was thirteen years and a volley ball player and to crown it all a Chihuahua manic. Despite all this, she led a gloomy lifestyle as she

Critical Awareness of Values and Ethics Case study Essay

Critical Awareness of Values and Ethics Case study - Essay Example All three key figures - the two deceased and the murderer - in the incident have a history of disrespect for the sanctity of marriage. Joe Korp was in two marital relationships before his affair with Tania Herman. Both Maria De Gois and Tania Herman did not consider having an affair with a married man a serious moral violation. The defence of Maria's consent to feature on an internet swinger's site by her relatives as an attempt to 'save' a troubled marriage is laughable. You cannot save a marriage by cutting it to pieces. The whole saga is testimony to the devastating effects of the neglect of family values and marital commitment. The second issue is the narrow materialistic viewpoint with which the whole incident was evaluated by the whole system - the families of the deceased, the media, and even the Supreme Court judge. Financial gain was definitely one of the motivations for Joe Korps conspiracy of killing his wife. Finally an issue that pops up is the propriety of removing life support systems for a patient who is not dead but is given up for dead by the doctors. There are various arguments both for and against mercy killing (Eckels,2005). This is an important issue, but I would not consider it central in this context. The deed had been done. Maria was never coming back. Whether she was living dead or 'dead' dead is a non-issue here although at another time or place it needs to be debated. Challenges to my values and morals: I cannot fathom the thought process of a self respecting man who decides to abandon his family for the sake of another lover. This is selfishness at its peak. To me this was the most devastating link in the whole chain of events that took place in Joe Korp's life. It opened him out to the possibilities that lay outside of the boundaries that one keeps for oneself. The murderous attempt on Maria was nothing but the logical conclusion of this thought process. When one chooses to rationalize to one's own self actions which are completely wrong, there is a whole paradigm shift in our own morality which leads to a vicious cycle resulting in even more grievous actions. Maria Korp was a tragic victim of her husband's financial aspirations and emotional hunger. No one deserves to be killed, but I cannot help thinking that somewhere a certain responsibility for her own undoing lays on her. Till she came along Joe Korp was a married man with a family. Wasn't it she who opened him up to the possibility of unfaithfulness Was there not insensitivity not just to the unfortunate Leonie but also to her children Maria Korp thought nothing of permanently destabilising the lives of three other people for her own sake. Steve Deegan defended his sister Tania by describing her as vulnerable and unlucky in love. However how can one accept anyone justifying an act of attempting to kill another person on these grounds Disregard for the life of another is unacceptable. Needless to say she too displayed the same insensitivity to the needs and rights of others. Although one can argue that she did not know Joe was married. How can one explain the fact that she not only stuck with him after having been lied to by him, but also aided him in his desire to murder his wife The financial gain

Oxford Guide to British and American Culture Essay Example for Free

Oxford Guide to British and American Culture Essay I would like to talk about the culture dictionary, more specifically about the Oxford Guide to British and American Culture. The importance of such dictionaries became unquestionable when the culturological approach to the study of languages appeared. This approach means the unity of the language and culture. To acquire a language, a person should have the knowledge of special features of communication, behavior, people’s mind, habits, values, traditions in the country which language he/she learns. Surely, the history and specific features of the particular country are embodied in its language. A language is a part of a culture. So the more you know culture of a particular country, the more you understand its language. In the most of dictionaries you can find cultural information and culture words. For example, â€Å"Whitehall† and â€Å"fly-fishing† in the Macmillan Dictionary and Thesaurus online, â€Å"Big Ben† in the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English online. КÐ °Ã'€Ã'‚Ð ¸Ã ½Ã ºÃ ¸ Ð ºÃ °Ã'€Ã'‚Ð ¸Ã ½Ã ºÃ ¸Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. But if we compare these words with the same words in the Oxford Guide to British and American Culture, we will see that the second dictionary gives us more information and explanations about particular words and even gives us a lot of illustrations. So I would like to talk about this dictionary. It is published by the Oxford university press. This is the most up-to-date Guide to British and American culture that gives us an insight into what’s important in both countries today, what’s popular, and what people feel strongly about. It’s written for learners of English, in language that’s easy to understand. This Guide includes 10 000 entries of such areas as history, monuments, legends, festivals, music, food, shopping, literature and so on. It also includes special entries with extra vocabulary on topics such as advertising, football, beer and soap operas. This vocabulary is highlighted in dark type. So let’s look at entries of this dictionary and find out what information we can find there. Entry words or phrases are in dark type. Almost Each entry has grammar information. ( a part of speech, if it is a noun (countable or uncountable, plural or single, if it is a verb, transitive or intransitive), information about the usage of this word or phrase. Many words have the derivatives section which is marked by the special symbol. Many words have a transcription and in some entries we can see both British and American pronunciation. And we can see the information bout a stress. Many words have subject, regional or stylistic labels. If we look at some entries we can see the number in round brackets. It indicates what sense this meaning refers to. For example, the word Manhattan in this entry has the number one. It means that this word is given in the first sense. Many entries have words that are marked by the special symbol ( a star). It indicates an item with its own entry. In this dictionary there are special notes that can help to find out not only the meaning of a particular word but also offer the vocabulary on this topic. The vocabulary is highlighted in dark type. Above some head words we can see numbers. They distinguish separate entries for people, places, etc with the same name. In entries that give the information about people we can see numbers in round brackets that indicate birth and death dates or birth of a living person. In this dictionary there are a lot of â€Å"dummy† entries referring to main entries elsewhere. It can help to find a particular word if you know only its abbreviation. Also the entry gives information about an abbreviation. In some entries there are variants of head words (entry words) and explanations of uncommon words used in entry. There are a lot of examples of their usage in italic type. Many words have many senses. So in entries we can see separate numbered parts. In entries there are cross-references to contrasted entries and related entries. Also this dictionary is very good because it has a lot of illustrations and well-known quotations associated with a character or a person and extracts of famous poems. In this Guide there are boxes with additional information. In entries we can see cultural connotations. Inside front cover we can find information about abbreviations, symbols and labels used in the Guide. Inside back cover there is information about pronunciation and phonetic symbols. In this Guide there are colour pages on history and institutions of Britain and the USA (Maps, history, political parties, education, the Legal System and so on) Using this Guide you can get ideas of what to read. You can choose from lists of books that won the Booker and other prizes plus suggestions for further reading. In conclusion, Id like to say that the Oxford Guide to British and American Culture is a great choice for people who want to find out as much as possible about the culture of Great Britain and the USA without visiting these countries.

Wrestling Match Loss Essay -- Narrative Memoir Essays

Wrestling Match Loss    As I crawled off of the mat in anguish, I couldn't believe that I let it happen again. My one chance to settle the score and truly prove that I was better, was gone. My coaches and friends tried to tell me how good I did and how lucky he got, but it only made the pain worse. They put into perspective exactly how close I was to beating him, and it just made me think more. Think about how this was his last year, and how I would never be able to avenge my defeat. It made me feel like everything that I had worked for all season was lost in a split second, one that I couldn't take back. The 2000-2001 wrestling season started off the same as any other with tormenting practices and the effort to get in as good of shape as possible for the upcoming season. I can truly tell you that wrestling is the most physically and mentally demanding activity that I have ever participated in. The amount of joy when you win is overwhelming because it was all you and nobody can say that they won it for you. Unfortunately, the same can be said about losing. I can't describe how it feels to lose a close match that you know that you should have won. Learning to deal with that feeling and move on is the hard part of it. You have to be mentally tough and realize that it just makes you better to lose small, than to win big. I started the season off well, but didn't win a tournament until late in the season in Lake County. In the finals of that tournament I wrestled a kid from Cedaredge by the name of Roy Gage. The reason that I singled this match out is because you will probably be hearing quite a bit more about Mr. Gage. In a previous dual match, I had pinned Roy in the first period and he didn't seem to be much more than a du... ...e mat in disbelief. It took me a while to recover from the crushing loss. I didn't talk to anybody the rest of the day, and pretty much kept to myself. Charlie, James, and Kyle cheered me up a little with their wins in the finals. I almost forgot about the match completely when James won state, but afterwards it all came back to me. The match still haunts me today, but I think that it will do more good than harm. It will make me work harder this year to make sure that I don't get put in a situation like that again, and if I do then I will remember how bad it was to lose to someone that shouldn't have beat me. I'm convinced that it will make me work that much harder not to let it happen again. I got fourth at state as a Junior, which is pretty good, but that match will remain in my memory forever, and it will make me shoot for bigger and better things this year.